FPS limitations

Questions, comments and suggestions regarding Phase One IQ4, IQ3, IQ2 and IQ1 series digital camera backs.

FPS limitations

Postby Clark » Tue Jun 25, 2019 12:11 pm

Hi there. I recently hired an IQ3 100MP + XF for a commercial shoot, and was struck by the slow rate at which it was possible to shoot images.

I was tethered with USB3.

What's the bottleneck? Is it the data transfer via the cable, or the image capture in the back?

Is it any faster using card?

Do any of the other backs do a higher FPS?
Clark
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:53 pm

Re: FPS limitations

Postby Jon » Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:14 pm

Speed will depend on the file type chosen. IIQL-16bit will be the slowest, but the standard IIQ-L or IIQ-S will be about 1FPS.
Jon
Crew
Crew
 
Posts: 1240
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: New York, USA

Re: FPS limitations

Postby Clark » Sat Jul 06, 2019 8:52 am

HI Jon, thanks for the reply.

Sure, I was aware of the speed I was getting, and it was about 1 frame per second. For me this feels incredibly slow, as I am much more often using a Canon or Nikon that can shoot sometimes more than 10 times faster.

Now I'm not saying that to criticise Phase One in some immature fashion. The images being produced are much bigger of course, and on this occasion I needed that quality, and the camera delivered that beautifully.

I just wondered why it is so slow? Obviously there's a significantly bigger file size is at the root, but is it the data transfer to the storage media? Or the on-board processing of the images? I guess this is actually a pretty obvious question for anyone with a little technical knowledge.

Just wondering if new tech like CFExpress / USB-C might give us a jump in speeds in the near future with the next gen IQ backs, or if it's more likely to be a slower progression (if it's depending on computing power in the back)

Thanks, Clark
Clark
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:53 pm

Re: FPS limitations

Postby Jon » Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:45 pm

Hi Clark,

The two main limitations to capture rate are Sensor readout speed and camera recycle speed. In the case of the IQ3100, it is the sensor readout times that limit it rather than how fast the shutter can move. Digital backs will be slower than 35mm size sensors because they are pushing so much more data. After that, the power of the back and storage options are actually really well matched for performance. For instance, when shooting on USB 3 or to a UDMA 7 CF card, you will see little to no buffering even in fast continuous shooting. Tethering performance is often faster than DSLR because of the way we structure it.

IQ4 150mp can do up to 3 frames a second due to new technology in the sensor - in that case it is helped out by the XQD card as we can write the files almost instantly... thus it becomes possible to shoot continuously at 2-3 frames a second and never hit the buffer. It would be possible to have an even faster FPS rate with the 150mp sensor, but we would have to run at a lower bit depth (12 or 10 bit), but that negates the reason to use a high end camera.
Jon
Crew
Crew
 
Posts: 1240
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: New York, USA

Re: FPS limitations

Postby Clark » Thu Jul 11, 2019 6:47 am

Thanks again Jon for the very informative reply.

In the future I will definitely opt for the IQ4 then if possible!
Clark
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 6:53 pm


Return to Phase One IQ4, IQ3, IQ2 and IQ1 series camera backs



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests